Perez Alvarado v. Ricky Arepas and Hot Dogs, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Keyla Beatriz Perez Alvarado
Defendant: Ricky Arepas and Hot Dogs, Inc. and Ricardo De La Hoz
Case Number: 1:2013cv21528
Filed: April 29, 2013
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: Miami Office
County: Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29:0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez Alvarado v. Ricky Arepas and Hot Dogs, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keyla Beatriz Perez Alvarado
Represented By: K. David Kelly
Represented By: Jamie H. Zidell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricky Arepas and Hot Dogs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricardo De La Hoz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.