Jackson v. Burger King Corporation
Plaintiff: MARY L JACKSON
Defendant: BURGER KING CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2014cv00119
Filed: August 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Albany Office
County: Grady
Presiding Judge: W LOUIS SANDS
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff shall take nothing by his Second Amended Complaint and Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE J ABRAMS on 3/29/2016 (bcl) Modified on 3/30/2016 (bcl).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Burger King Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARY L JACKSON
Represented By: JAMES GARRITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BURGER KING CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?