MARENEM INC v. JUMP
Plaintiff: MARENEM INC
Defendant: DEANNA C JUMP
Case Number: 5:2012cv00212
Filed: June 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Hugh Lawson
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment, lifting the discovery stay and setting discovery deadlines. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/18/2013. (nbp)
March 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/1/2013. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARENEM INC v. JUMP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARENEM INC
Represented By: ELISA SMITH KODISH
Represented By: BRIAN D MCALHANEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEANNA C JUMP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?