Windsor v. Anderson et al

Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
Defendant: Carl Hugo Anderson and Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young
Case Number: 1:2011cv03563
Filed: October 18, 2011
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Cobb
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Windsor v. Anderson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Hugo Anderson
Represented By: Jack N. Sibley
Represented By: Carl Hugo Anderson, Jr.
Represented By: Robert Sheffield Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young
Represented By: Carl Hugo Anderson, Jr.
Represented By: Jack N. Sibley
Represented By: Robert Sheffield Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.