eWORKZ, Inc. v. Chorman et al

Plaintiff: eWORKZ, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel Chorman and Diversified Technology Services, LLC
Case Number: 1:2012cv00961
Filed: March 21, 2012
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 18:1030
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: eWORKZ, Inc. v. Chorman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: eWORKZ, Inc.
Represented By: Frederick Thomas Smith
Represented By: Suneel C. Gupta
Represented By: Eric F. Barton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Chorman
Represented By: Theresa Ann Y. Kananen
Represented By: Richard A. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Technology Services, LLC
Represented By: Theresa Ann Y. Kananen
Represented By: Richard A. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.