Carlson v. Tenet South Fulton, Inc. et al

Defendant: Tenet South Fulton, Inc. and South Fulton Medical Center, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Janice M. Carlson
Case Number: 1:2013cv00952
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: De Kalb
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlson v. Tenet South Fulton, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tenet South Fulton, Inc.
Represented By: Flora Manship
Represented By: Susan Wallis Pangborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Fulton Medical Center, L.L.C.
Represented By: Flora Manship
Represented By: Susan Wallis Pangborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice M. Carlson
Represented By: Viraj Parmar
Represented By: Thomas Jefferson Kerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.