Kelly v. Brown
Petitioner: Reginald Kelly, Sr.
Respondent: Ezell Brown
Case Number: 1:2013cv00988
Filed: March 26, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Newton
Presiding Judge: Janet F. King
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING the 17 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 7 and Petitioners Motion for Writ of Mandamus 16 are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability, under Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, is DENIED. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 10/11/2013. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Kelly, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ezell Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?