Bailey v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al

Plaintiff: Shalonda Bailey
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Case Number: 1:2013cv01292
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: Gwinnett
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shalonda Bailey
Represented By: Helen E. Zukin
Represented By: Fontaine Yuk
Represented By: Paul R. Kiesel
Represented By: Raymond Paul Boucher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Represented By: Sean K Burke
Represented By: William Durham Barwick
Represented By: Dana Jeffrey Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Group Inc
Represented By: William Durham Barwick
Represented By: Dana Jeffrey Ash
Represented By: Sean K Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.