Smith v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Faith Crystal Smith
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2013cv01421
Filed: April 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Gerrilyn G. Brill
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 14 Motion for Attorney Fees per EAJA. Defendant is DIRECTED to transmit to counsel for Plaintiff a check in the amount of $6,505.82, payable to Plaintiff, as payee. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 4/24/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Faith Crystal Smith
Represented By: Jaya Ann Shurtliff
Represented By: Kenneth R. Hiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?