Killer Joe Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-81
||Killer Joe Nevada, LLC
||April 30, 2013
||Georgia Northern District Court
||XX US, Outside State
||Julie E. Carnes
|Nature of Suit:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 28, 2013
ORDER AND OPINION vacating the Court's 3 May 8, 2013 Order. John Does 2-81 are severed and the actions against them are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to designate any actions filed against these severed defendants as re lated to this action, if they allege claims like those in the complaint filed here. With respect to John Doe 1, the only defendant now remaining in this action, the plaintiffs motion 2 is granted. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 5/28/13. (ddm)
|June 19, 2013
ORDER AND OPINION directing the plaintiff to immediately contact the ISPs to rescind and withdraw previously-issued subpoena for each such defendant. Any information that plaintiff may have obtained through these previously-issued subpoenas must be r eturned. Plaintiff shall ensure that this information is communicated to each ISP by June 25, 2013 and shall report back to the Court by July 1, 2013, providing copies of these letters to each ISP, as well as a report as to its compliance with this Order. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 6/18/13. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1, # 2 Attachment 2, # 3 Attachment 3, # 4 Attachment 4)(ddm)
|July 16, 2013
ORDER AND OPINION granting 7 Defendant's Motion to quash the subpoena and motion to proceed by pseudonym. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 7/16/13. (ddm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.