No Straw, LLC et al v. Stout Street Funding, LLC et al
| No Straw, LLC and James Watson |
| James Melton, Stout Street Funding, LLC and Atlanta Private Lending, LLC |
| 2:2012cv00182 |
| July 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Gainesville Office |
| Forsyth |
| Susan S. Cole |
| Richard W. Story |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER approving and adopting the Magistrate's 31 Report and Recommendations; 44 Report and Recommendations as the Opinion and Order of this Court. Defendants' Atlanta Private Lending, LLC and James Melton's 33 Motion to Enforce Settlement is GRANTED and all claims against these Defendants are DIMSISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant Stout Street Funding, LLC's approving 14 Motion to Dismiss as to Counts One, Two and Three of Plaintiffs' Complaint is GRANTED. The se counts include the only federal claims against Defendant, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Therefore, the remaining state law claims against Defendant Stout Street Funding, LLC are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' 19 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 06/14/13. (sk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
