Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. et al v. Universal Am-Can, Ltd.

Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. and Yancey Bros. Co.
Defendant: Universal Am-Can, Ltd.
Case Number: 4:2012cv00105
Filed: May 2, 2012
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Rome Office
County: Cobb
Presiding Judge: Harold L. Murphy
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. et al v. Universal Am-Can, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Represented By: Hobart M. Hind, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yancey Bros. Co.
Represented By: Hobart M. Hind, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Universal Am-Can, Ltd.
Represented By: Charles L. Howard
Represented By: Robert A. Luskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.