Brown v. Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC
| Isaiah Brown |
| Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC |
| 2:2014cv00052 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Glynn |
| James E. Graham |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. This case stand closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 3/21/2018. (pts)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/25/2018. (pts)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting 75 Motion to Stay Case. The parties shall file a status report with this Court as soon as the Eleventh Circuit issues its opinion. The status report shall provide detailed explanation as to how the Eleventh Circuit's decision affects this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 07/31/2017. (thb)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court hereby ORDERS that this matter is set for a Settlement Conference on Thursday, May 04, 2017, at 9:30 AM, in Courtroom 1, at the United States District Courthouse, 801 Gloucester Street, Brunswick, GA. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/28/2017. (ca)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER denying Defendants' 57 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 62 Amended Motion for Reconsideration ; denying as moot Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Reconsideration; and directing that Plaintiff's remaining claim for reinstatement shall proceed to trial. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 6/17/2016. (jah)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the parties' 46 Joint Motion to Stay Discovery and Other Proceedings. No further extensions will be granted. The Court will, however, stay the civil motions deadline, pending the Eleventh Circuit's resolution of Plaintiff's appeal. The parties shall file the appropriate motions within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Eleventh Circuit's opinion. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 7/20/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part Defendants' 27 Motion for Summary Judgment on judicial estoppel grounds; denying Defendants' 35 request for attorney's fees and costs, as well as their 34 Motion for Oral Argument on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and ruling that Plaintiff Isaiah Brown's equitable claim for reinstatement shall proceed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 05/20/2015. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Isaiah Brown | |
| Represented By: | Rita C. Spalding |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
