Gibbs v. Express Scripts, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cherie Gibbs
Defendant: Express Scripts, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv00078
Filed: May 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Brunswick Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA of 1993)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice filed by Cherie Gibbs. The Clerk is ordered to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/8/2015. (ca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gibbs v. Express Scripts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cherie Gibbs
Represented By: Maria S. Lugue, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Express Scripts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?