Johnson v. Warden of Calhoun State Prison

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Southern District Johnson v. Warden of Calhoun State Prison

Johnson v. Warden of Calhoun State Prison

Petitioner:	Antinto Seantre Johnson
Respondent:	Warden of Calhoun State Prison
Case Number:	2:2014cv00174
Filed:	December 1, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Brunswick Office
County:	Appling
Presiding Judge:	James E. Graham
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 30, 2015	Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Furthermore, Johnson is hereby DENIED a certificate of appealability, and he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/30/2015. (ca)
June 18, 2015	Filing 13 ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, be dismissed without prejudice and Respondent's 7 MOTION to Dismiss be granted. I further recommend that Johnson be de nied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and a certificate of appealability. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. ( Objections to R&R due by 7/6/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/18/2015. (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 30, 2015

Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Furthermore, Johnson is hereby DENIED a certificate of appealability, and he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/30/2015. (ca)

June 18, 2015

Filing 13 ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, be dismissed without prejudice and Respondent's 7 MOTION to Dismiss be granted. I further recommend that Johnson be de nied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and a certificate of appealability. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. ( Objections to R&R due by 7/6/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/18/2015. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Warden of Calhoun State Prison
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Antinto Seantre Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden of Calhoun State Prison
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?