United States Of America et al v. Renessenz, LLC
The State of Georgia and United States Of America |
Renessenz, LLC |
2:2014cv00185 |
December 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brunswick Office |
Glynn |
R Stan Baker-MJ |
Lisa G Wood |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER re: #4 Order on Motion to Enter Consent Decree, this case is hereby closed. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/3/2016. (csr) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Enter Proposed Consent Decree. It is hereby Ordered that the Proposed Consent Decree between Plaintiffs and Defendant shall be entered by the Court in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/9/2015. (csr) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Enter Consent Decree by United States Of America. Responses due by 3/23/2015. (Attachments: #1 Memo In Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(Bueno, Edgar) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker pursuant to standing Order in MC215-3. Magistrate Judge James E. Graham no longer assigned to the case. (csr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by United States Of America Lodging of Consent Decree (Attachments: #1 Consent Decree)(Bueno, Edgar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Renessenz, LLC filed by United States Of America, The State of Georgia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.