Cruz v. Hastings

Cruz v. Hastings

Petitioner:	Hector J. Cruz
Respondent:	Suzanne Hastings
Case Number:	2:2015cv00011
Filed:	January 21, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Brunswick Office
County:	Wayne
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 9, 2015	Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 11 Report and Recommendation and GRANTS Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss. Cruz's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Additionally, the Court DENIES Cruz leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/9/2015. (csr)
November 6, 2015	Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Respondent's 8 MOTION to Dismiss, be GRANTED and that Cruz's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, be DISMISSED and this case be CLOSED. I further RECOMMEND that Cruz be DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2015). ORDER directing service of the Magistrate Judge's REPORT and RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 11/6/2015. (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 9, 2015

Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 11 Report and Recommendation and GRANTS Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss. Cruz's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Additionally, the Court DENIES Cruz leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/9/2015. (csr)

November 6, 2015

Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Respondent's 8 MOTION to Dismiss, be GRANTED and that Cruz's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, be DISMISSED and this case be CLOSED. I further RECOMMEND that Cruz be DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2015). ORDER directing service of the Magistrate Judge's REPORT and RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 11/6/2015. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cruz v. Hastings
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Hector J. Cruz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Suzanne Hastings
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?