Robinson v. Medical Staff at Ware State Prison

Defendant: Medical Staff at Ware State Prison
Plaintiff: Bernard Robinson
Case Number: 5:2013cv00023
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Waycross Office
County: Ware
Referring Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 7 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is hereby authorized and directed to enter an appropriate Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 7/22/2013. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Medical Staff at Ware State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medical Staff at Ware State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.