Pearson v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. et al
| Richard E. Pearson |
| Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Inc., Roger Dale Griffis and H. H. Burnet & Company Insurance and Real Estate, Inc. |
| Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. and Roger Dale Griffis |
| Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. |
| Richard E. Pearson and Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. |
| Richard E. Pearson |
| 5:2014cv00060 |
| August 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Brantley |
| James E. Graham |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER granting Plaintiff Pearson's 41 Motion to Remand to Ware County Superior Court; denying Defendant Catlin's 5 Motion to Amend/Correct. The remaining issues of Catlin's Motion to Dispense (Dtk. no. 6), Catlin's Motion to Strike (Dtk. no. 12), and Pearson's Motion for Leave to Amend (Dtk. no. 40) will be decided by the Ware County Superior Court Judge. The Clerk is directed to remand this case to the Superior Court of Ware County. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/17/2015. (ca)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER and NOTICE of Pretrial Proceedings; the proposed pretrial order shall be filed by the close of business on 4/5/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 9/4/2014. (ca) Modified on 9/4/2014 (ca).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
