Perez v. Superior Court Of Guam

Plaintiff: Debbie Ann Reyes Perez
Defendant: Superior Court Of Guam
Case Number: 1:2008cv00007
Filed: June 9, 2008
Court: Guam District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Guam
Presiding Judge: Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 7, 2009 60 Opinion or Order of the Court Order granting 48 Motion for Reconsideration; denying in part and granting in part reconsidered Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Motions In Limine; and denying 51 Request for Hearing. Signed by U.S. District Judge Alex R. Munson on 12/7/2009. (fad, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Superior Court Of Guam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debbie Ann Reyes Perez
Represented By: Phillip Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Court Of Guam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.