Pacific Renewable Energy Solutions, Inc. v. Sedna Aire Americas, LLC et al
| Pacific Renewable Energy Solutions, Inc. |
| Rock W. Henderson, Sedna Aire Americas, LLC, Energy Specialty Source, LLC, Alan E. Verhonich and Dave R. Hein |
| 1:2011cv00019 |
| June 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Hagatna Office |
| Guam |
| Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood |
| Joaquin V.E. Manibusan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
Order granting 54 Motion to Compel Arbitration, granting Alternative Request to Stay Proceedings. The court directs the Defendants to file a report with the court on 1/2/2015 and every three (3) months thereafter, advising it of the status of the arbitration proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 9/30/2014. (fad, )
|
|
Filing
52
Order granting 27 Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Default; granting 30 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. The underlying entry of default and default judgment against Defendants Hein and Henderson are vacated. The court declines to vacate the default judgment as it relates to Defendant ESS. Defendants Hein and Henderson are ordered to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint no later than 4/30/2013. Failure to do so may result in the court reinstating the default judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 4/2/2013. (fad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
