Foss Maritime Company v. R/V Alucia, Official Number 7347823, her engines, machinery, gear, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, furnishings, etc.

Plaintiff: Foss Maritime Company
Defendant: R/V Alucia, Official Number 7347823, her engines, machinery, gear, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, furnishings, etc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00024
Filed: October 15, 2012
Court: Guam District Court
Office: Hagatna Office
County: Guam
Presiding Judge: Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Referring Judge: Joaquin V.E. Manibusan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foss Maritime Company v. R/V Alucia, Official Number 7347823, her engines, machinery, gear, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, furnishings, etc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Foss Maritime Company
Represented By: Anita Perez Arriola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R/V Alucia, Official Number 7347823, her engines, machinery, gear, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, furnishings, etc.
Represented By: David W. Dooley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.