Kupau v. United States Department of Labor

Petitioner: Oliver H. Kupau
Respondent: United States Department of Labor
Case Number: 1:2008cv00296
Filed: June 23, 2008
Court: Hawaii District Court
Office: Labor: Reporting/Disclosure Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Referring Judge: LESLIE E KOBAYASHI
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: Labor-Mgmt Reporting and Disclosure Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 5, 2009 96 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S 51 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO APPLICABILITY OF 29 U.S.C. § 504. Signed by Chief JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on February 4, 2009. (bbb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kupau v. United States Department of Labor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Oliver H. Kupau
Represented By: Reginald P. Minn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Department of Labor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.