Moseley v. State of Hawaii et al
| K. F. Moseley |
| State of Hawaii, Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA), KGMB, KHNL, KFVE, MYNETWORKTV and DOES 1-100 |
| 1:2010cv00255 |
| May 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Hawaii |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO RESTRAIN CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE SCHEDULED FOR TONIGHT; ORDER STRIKING "PETITION" WITH LEAVE TO FILE A DOCUMENT TITLED "AMENDED COMPLAINT" 1 , 4 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI M OLLWAY on 5/3/10. ("Because Moseley has not met the standard for enjoining tonight's congressional debate, the motion to enjoin the debate, which this court construes as a motion for temporary injunctive relief, is denied. The court also strikes Moseley's petition, but gives Moseley leave to file an "Amended Complaint" no later than May 31, 2010.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A copy of this order has been served by First Class Mail to K. F. Moseley at the address of record on May 3, 2010.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
