GPNE Corp. v. Sharp Corporation et al

Plaintiff: GPNE Corp.
Defendant: Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cross_claimant: Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Corporation
Cross_defendant: GPNE Corp.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00253
Filed: May 10, 2012
Court: Hawaii District Court
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Referring Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GPNE Corp. v. Sharp Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GPNE Corp.
Represented By: Jordon Jun Kimura
Represented By: Steven W. Hartsell
Represented By: Zachary R. Gates
Represented By: Stephen Y. Chow
Represented By: Alexandra Capachietti
Represented By: Barry J. Bumgardner
Represented By: Robert G. Klein
Represented By: Kenneth J. Mansfield
Represented By: Shaun M. Mukai
Represented By: Paul T. Muniz
Represented By: Howard J. Susser
Represented By: Merton E. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth S. Chang
Represented By: Gary G. Grimmer
Represented By: Matthew C. Holohan
Represented By: David E. Sipiora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Electronics Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth S. Chang
Represented By: Gary G. Grimmer
Represented By: Matthew C. Holohan
Represented By: David E. Sipiora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: Sharp Electronics Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth S. Chang
Represented By: Gary G. Grimmer
Represented By: Matthew C. Holohan
Represented By: David E. Sipiora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: Sharp Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth S. Chang
Represented By: Gary G. Grimmer
Represented By: Matthew C. Holohan
Represented By: David E. Sipiora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: GPNE Corp.
Represented By: Barry J. Bumgardner
Represented By: Alexandra Capachietti
Represented By: Stephen Y. Chow
Represented By: Zachary R. Gates
Represented By: Steven W. Hartsell
Represented By: Jordon Jun Kimura
Represented By: Robert G. Klein
Represented By: Kenneth J. Mansfield
Represented By: Shaun M. Mukai
Represented By: Paul T. Muniz
Represented By: Howard J. Susser
Represented By: Merton E. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.