United States of America v. United States Currency

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Hawaii District Court United States of America v. United States Currency

United States of America v. United States Currency

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	United States Currency
Case Number:	1:2012cv00393
Filed:	July 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	ALAN C KAY
Presiding Judge:	RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit:	Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 14, 2013	Filing 30 FINAL JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORFEITURE. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 06/14/2013. (eps) -- Based upon the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement entered on June 13, 2013, which resolved all claims to the above-captioned defendan t property by Claimant Anusuya Shapley (ECF No. 29 ); $2,140.00 of the above-captioned defendant property is hereby forfeited to the United States of America, free and clear of the claims of any and all persons or entities claiming an y right, title or interest in or to the defendant property, and the United States Marshals Service is hereby directed to dispose of the forfeited $2,140.00 in accordance with the law. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE< /center>Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Date Filed

Document Text

June 14, 2013

Filing 30 FINAL JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORFEITURE. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 06/14/2013. (eps) -- Based upon the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement entered on June 13, 2013, which resolved all claims to the above-captioned defendan t property by Claimant Anusuya Shapley (ECF No. 29 ); $2,140.00 of the above-captioned defendant property is hereby forfeited to the United States of America, free and clear of the claims of any and all persons or entities claiming an y right, title or interest in or to the defendant property, and the United States Marshals Service is hereby directed to dispose of the forfeited $2,140.00 in accordance with the law. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE< /center>Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. United States Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Rachel S. Moriyama
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?