Teruya v. BAE Systems Hawaii Shipyards et al
Jason Y. Teruya |
BAE Systems Hawaii Shipyards, James P. Allecia and Ernesto Jose , Jr. |
1:2013cv00003 |
January 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
Civil Rights: Other |
Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND MOTION FOR WRIT OF EXECUTION re 34 , 36 , 37 - - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 7/11/13. "The court dismisses Teru ya's action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. If Teruya has remedy at this point, it is not attainable by suing BAE Systems in this court. The court leaves it to Teruya to investigate whe ther he may seek clarification by an Administrative Law Judge of whether Enumerated Order No. 5 in Judge Etchingham's Decision and Order required the Special Fund to reimburse BAE Systems for overpayments while continuing to pay Teruya $2 50.67 per week beginning with the 105th week from February 9, 2006." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Jason Teruya served by first class mail at the address of record on July 11, 2013. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.