Toguchi v. Matayoshi et al
Plaintiff: Monica Toguchi
Defendant: Kathryn Matayoshi, Loretta J. Fuddy and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2013cv00380
Filed: July 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: DERRICK K. WATSON
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT 1 AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNT 2. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/17/2015. ~ The Court hereby denies defendants motion to dismiss Count 1 (Dkt. No. 96 ) and grants the individual capacity defendants' motions to dismiss Count 2 (Dkt. Nos. 97 and 98 ). (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
December 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 20 , 34 , 59 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/31/2014. ~ The Court hereby grants the motions to dismiss Counts 1 through 4 and the motio n for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. Nos. 20, 34, and 59). Toguchi is granted leave to amend Counts 1 and 3 in conformity with this order. Any amended complaint shall be filed by January 30, 2015. Failure to file an amended complaint by January 30, 2015 will result in the automatic dismissal of this action without further notice. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toguchi v. Matayoshi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Toguchi
Represented By: Sarah R. Devine
Represented By: Eric A. Seitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathryn Matayoshi
Represented By: John F. Molay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loretta J. Fuddy
Represented By: John F. Molay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?