||Truman Lee Ketchmark
||April 4, 2013
||Hawaii District Court
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 9, 2013
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE COMPLAINT LODGED APRIL 4, 2013, PURSUANT TO PREFILING REVIEW ORDER OF FEBRUARY 24, 2011, IN CIVIL NO. 10-00725 DEA/LK - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/8/13. "Pursuant to Judge Ezra 39;s prefiling order, the court determines that the "Complaint" ofApril 4, 2013, does not merit further review and will not be litigated. The Clerk of Court is ordered to retain Ketchmark's "Complaint" in the court's f iles as Misc. No. 13-00059 SOM/KSC. If Ketchmark is able to file a nonfrivolous Complaint that states claims upon which relief can be granted, he may submit that Complaint to this court pursuant to the prefiling review order. To the extent Ketchmar k desires to appeal any previous order, he shall file an appropriate document in the case being appealed. To the extent Ketchmark may be asking the court to lift the prefiling order, he has failed to provide the court with any argument supporting such a request. The court declines to lift the prefiling order under the present circumstances." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Truman Lee Ketchmark served by first class mail at the address of record on April 9, 2013.
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.