Tsuji v. Kamehameha Schools
| Stanley R. Tsuji |
| Kamehameha Schools, John Does 1-100 and Jane Does 1-100 |
| 1:2014cv00206 |
| May 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 56 ; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF STANLEY TSUJI'S COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 61 . Signed by CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE J. MICHAEL S EABRIGHT on 12/22/2015. (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on December 23, 2015.
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 17 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/9/2014. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on July 10, 2014.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
