Field v. Luke et al
Dane S. Field |
Vicki Y. Ebesu and Harrison Farm Luke |
1:2014cv00423 |
September 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
Withdrawal |
11 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE IN ORDER TO SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT JURY TRIAL re 1 - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 9/22/2014. "IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c) (1) and Rule 9033(d) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Recommendation to District Court to Withdraw Reference in Order to Schedule and Conduct Jury Trial is ADOPTED. Magistrate Judge Puglisi shall issue a Scheduling Order set ting a trial date and deadlines for trial-related submissions. Judge Faris shall retain jurisdiction for all other purposes until sixty days prior to the trial date to facilitate prompt resolution of this matter and to set meaningful deadlines for the completion of all pretrial matters." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.