McLemore v. Dennis Dillon Automotive Group Inc et al
||Dennis Dillon Automotive Group Inc and Donald J Farley
||November 15, 2012
||Idaho District Court
||Boise - Southern Office
||Ada - Southern
||Mikel H. Williams
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 8, 2013
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs Complaint 2 is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND to cure the deficiencies referred to above. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within which to file an Amended Complaint.. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|June 12, 2013
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 7 is DISMISSED in its entirety. It is dismissed against Defendants Brad Dillon, Gary Luper, and Tim Byers with prejudice and without leave to amend as to Title VII claims . If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action against Dennis Dillon on the Count I Title VII claim and/or the Count II defamation claim, and to proceed against Tim Byers on the Count II defamation claim, he shall have 30 days from the date of thi s Order within which to file a Second Amended Complaint. (Second Amended Complaint due by 7/12/2013). Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.