Burlington Insurance Company v. Guerdon Enterprises LLC et al
| Burlington Insurance Company |
| Cahill South LLC, Cahill Associates South Inc., Cahill North Construction, Inc., Cahill Park Homeowners Association, Castle Group California, Inc., Guerdon Enterprises LLC and Cahill Associates South LP |
| 1:2013cv00078 |
| February 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Candy W. Dale |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR Plan to be filed by 2/14/2014. Amended Pleadings due by 2/14/2014. Completion of Discovery due by 10/10/2014. Joinder of Parties due by 2/14/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 11/10/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, Stay, or Transfer 10 is DENIED. Defendant Cahill Park Homeowners Association's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 13 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
