Peterson v. Reinke et al
Steven A Peterson |
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Richard Craig, Jeremy Clark, Garrett Coburn, Doug Klinger, Sandy Jones, Bill Young, Mark Funaiole, Jane Dressen, Norman Langerak and Mike Mathews |
1:2014cv00477 |
November 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
Candy W. Dale |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 22 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' Motion to Seal (Dkt. 21 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 22 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants shall file a supplemental memorandum as directed above within 30 days after entry of this Order, and the Court will re-open consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff may file a responsive supplemental memorandum within 30 days after Defendants file their supplemental memorandum. Defendants may file a reply, if desired, within 21 days. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.