Keokuk Junction Railway Company v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp.
| Keokuk Junction Railway Company |
| Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp. |
| 1:2011cv01139 |
| April 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Peoria |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| James E. Shadid |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 10101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/5/2013: IT IS ORDERED that the Court adopts in-part the findings of the Report and Recommendation 80 . For the reasons set forth in the full written order (see attached), Defendants TP&W, San Pedro Trails, Strong Capital, Kenneth L. Dean, Nina S. Dean, Jeffrey F. Dean, and Melissa A. Dean's collective 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss 38 61 64 71 are DENIED. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER) (JRK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiff Keokuk Junction Railway Corporation's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 22 is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff may amend the Complaint to substitute Count I in the proposed Amended Complaint for the claim in the Complaint. Plaintiff's request to add the proposed Count II is DENIED, in part. Plaintiff may not file Count II as written. Plaintiff, however, may file an amended Count II which joins as additional defendants the entities related to Defendant that Plaintiff claims participated in the transfers alleged in Count II. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint that comports with this Opinion by 1/25/2013. Defendant Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp. is directed to answer or otherwise plead by 2/8/2013. Parties are directed to meet and confer and submit proposed supplemental deadlines by 2/15/2013. Final pretrial and bench trial dates currently scheduled are cancelled. See written order entered by Judge Cudmore on 1/2/2013. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore: Plaintiff Keokuk Junction Railway Company's Motion for Joinder of Parties 18 DENIED. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 9/14/11 - Accordingly, the Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation 10 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 8 is DENIED. TP&W is directed to answer the Complaint within 21 days of this Order, and this mater is again REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Cudmore for further proceedings.(SF, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keokuk Junction Railway Company v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keokuk Junction Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | James L Hafele |
| Represented By: | Brian D Mooty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
