King v. Goodwill Ind

Defendant: Goodwill Ind
Plaintiff: Phyllis King
Case Number: 1:2013cv01095
Filed: March 4, 2013
Court: Illinois Central District Court
Office: Peoria Office
County: Peoria
Referring Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disablilites Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 20, 2013 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations 17 . Accordingly, based on the agreement of the parties, Plaintiff's racial discrimination claims is DISMISSED. All other claims remain. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 8/20/2013. (cc: Pro Se Plf)(RK, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Goodwill Ind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goodwill Ind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phyllis King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.