Drummond v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
| Durrell Drummond |
| Edward L Montwill, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and Andrew Tilden |
| 1:2014cv01405 |
| October 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Jonathan E. Hawley |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/12/2014. It is further ORDERED THAT the Clerk is directed to: 1) show Plaintiffs motion for status 6 denied as moot in light of this Order; 2) show Plaintiffs motion for counsel 5 denie d; 3) attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures; and 4) set an internal court deadline 60 days from the entry of this Order (2/12/2015) for the Court to check on the status of serviced and enter scheduling deadlines. Lastly, i t is ORDERED that, if a Defendant fail to sign and return a waiver of service to the Clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will take appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S. Marshals Service on that Defendant and will require that Defendant to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2). See full Opinion attached.(RK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
