Suhadolnik v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District Suhadolnik v. United States of America

Suhadolnik v. United States of America

Plaintiff:	Michael Suhadolnik
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	3:2010cv03021
Filed:	January 27, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Sangamon
Presiding Judge:	Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:	Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit:	Taxes
Cause of Action:	26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2011	Filing 34 ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration ; ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/1/2011. (CT, ilcd)
June 2, 2011	Filing 31 OPINION: Defendant/Counterclaimant United States' Motionfor Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff Michael F. Suhadolnik isDENIED as to the dismissal of his refund claim and ALLOWED insofaras it seeks a judgment obligating Michael F. Suhadolnik to t he UnitedStates in the amount of $263,628.71, plus interest from February 8,2011. Out of concern for the resources of all involved, the Court ordersthe Government to file an additional pleading which states whether itintends to continue to conte st Mr. Suhadolnik's $938.36 refund claim(and associated costs) or whether that amount will be conceded anddeducted from the more than $263,628.71 judgment allowed herein.The Government's brief is due June 14, 2011. Mr. Suhadolnik shallrespond by June 21, 2011. The Government's reply is due June 28,2011. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/1/2011. (CT, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2011

Filing 34 ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration ; ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/1/2011. (CT, ilcd)

June 2, 2011

Filing 31 OPINION: Defendant/Counterclaimant United States' Motionfor Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff Michael F. Suhadolnik isDENIED as to the dismissal of his refund claim and ALLOWED insofaras it seeks a judgment obligating Michael F. Suhadolnik to t he UnitedStates in the amount of $263,628.71, plus interest from February 8,2011. Out of concern for the resources of all involved, the Court ordersthe Government to file an additional pleading which states whether itintends to continue to conte st Mr. Suhadolnik's $938.36 refund claim(and associated costs) or whether that amount will be conceded anddeducted from the more than $263,628.71 judgment allowed herein.The Government's brief is due June 14, 2011. Mr. Suhadolnik shallrespond by June 21, 2011. The Government's reply is due June 28,2011. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/1/2011. (CT, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suhadolnik v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Suhadolnik
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?