Bell v. Saddler
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Defendant: Michelle R.B. Saddler
Case Number: 3:2014cv03046
Filed: February 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Schuyler
Presiding Judge: Sue E. Myerscough
Presiding Judge: Springfield Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/1/2014. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, d/e 2 is GRANTED. Based upon his inability to pay, no reduced filing fee will be assessed against Plaintiff. This case is now in the process of service. (MAS, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Saddler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle R.B. Saddler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?