Acuity Optical Laboratories, LLC v. Davis Vision Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District Acuity Optical Laboratories, LLC v. Davis Vision Inc

Acuity Optical Laboratories, LLC v. Davis Vision Inc

Petitioner:	Acuity Optical Laboratories, LLC
Respondent:	Davis Vision Inc
Case Number:	3:2014cv03231
Filed:	July 29, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	McLean
Presiding Judge:	Sue E. Myerscough
Presiding Judge:	Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit:	Antitrust
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 23, 2016	Filing 50 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/23/2016. Davis Vision's Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 27 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Davis Vision's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Counts III; IV; V; VI; IX; X; XI and XIV and DENIED with leave to Refile the Motion at the close of discovery as to Counts I; II; VII; VIII; XII and XIII. Acuity's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, d/e 35 is DENIED. This case is REFERRED to U. S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins for a Status Conference on how discovery shall proceed. (MAS, ilcd)
November 13, 2014	Filing 16 OPINION: The Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 10 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court strikes Affirmative Defenses No. 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, and 12 without prejudice. If Respondent chooses to amend any of the affirmative defenses, Respondent shall do so on or before November 26, 2014. The Court sua sponte strikes Affirmative Defense No. 15 with prejudice. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/13/2014. See Written Order. (ME, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 23, 2016

Filing 50 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/23/2016. Davis Vision's Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 27 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Davis Vision's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Counts III; IV; V; VI; IX; X; XI and XIV and DENIED with leave to Refile the Motion at the close of discovery as to Counts I; II; VII; VIII; XII and XIII. Acuity's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, d/e 35 is DENIED. This case is REFERRED to U. S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins for a Status Conference on how discovery shall proceed. (MAS, ilcd)

November 13, 2014

Filing 16 OPINION: The Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 10 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court strikes Affirmative Defenses No. 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, and 12 without prejudice. If Respondent chooses to amend any of the affirmative defenses, Respondent shall do so on or before November 26, 2014. The Court sua sponte strikes Affirmative Defense No. 15 with prejudice. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/13/2014. See Written Order. (ME, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acuity Optical Laboratories, LLC v. Davis Vision Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Acuity Optical Laboratories, LLC
Represented By:	Nicholas Tyler Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Davis Vision Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?