Jones v. City of Lincoln et al
Jeffrey T Jones |
City of Lincoln, Keith DeVore, Officer Clements, Cpl. Matthew Vlahovich, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 |
3:2014cv03394 |
December 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Montgomery |
James E. Shadid |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/02/2015. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted (22). (2) This case is dismissed as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (3) All pending mo tions are denied as moot (24), and this case is closed. (4) The final pretrial and trial dates are vacated. (5) Defendant may file to recover his costs within the time prescribed by local rule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54. If Plaintiff plans to claim indigenc y in response to Defendant's bill of costs, Plaintiff must file an affidavit setting forth his assets, liabilities, income, and employment. (6) If Plaintiff seeks to appeal, he must file a notice of appeal in this Court within 30 days of the entry of the judgment. IfPlaintiff intends to file a petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, he should explain why he believes the Court's decision is incorrect. See full written Opinion.(JS, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.