CMB Export, LLC et al v. Atteberry et al
| CMB Export, LLC and CMB Summit, LLC |
| Kimberly Atteberry, Christopher Atteberry and Vermillion Consulting, LLC |
| 4:2013cv04051 |
| June 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Rock Island |
| Sara Darrow |
| John A. Gorman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on June 26, 2017. Plaintiffs' 102 motion to certify the Court's September 29, 2016 Order for interlocutory appeal and its 106 motion seeking leave to reply to Defendants' response are DENIED. (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER entered on September 29, 2016 by Judge Sara Darrow. Plaintiff CMB's 84 objection is DENIED, and the Magistrate Judge's order of October 20, 2015 AFFIRMED. The 94 , 96 motions to strike are MOOT. Plaintiff's 98 motion seeking to present additional authority is GRANTED. (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on August 20, 2014, DENYING Defendants' 25 Motion to Stay Proceedings. The Court also enforces its 24 Order denying Defendants' 12 Motion to Seal and directs the Clerk to unseal documents 14 , 15 , 19 , and 20 . Defendants' sealed 23 Motion to Stay and Plaintiffs' 26 Motion to Strike or Consolidate are MOOT. (MRD, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
