Hoepner v. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Donald C Hoepner
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 4:2014cv04067
Filed: July 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Rock Island Office
County: Rock Island
Presiding Judge: Sara Darrow
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E. Hawley
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 13, 2015. The Government's 2 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close the case. (SC, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoepner v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Gerard A Brost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald C Hoepner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?