United States of America v. Elman et al
| United States of America |
| Marcy Elman and TCF National Bank |
| 1:2010cv06369 |
| October 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| Blanche M. Manning |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 12/6/2012:Mailed noticeThe United States of Americas motion for summary judgment 47 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: the motion for judgment on Count I is granted and judgment on that count is entered in the amount of $310,502.25; the motion for judgment on Count II is denied without prejudice. By December 21, 2012, the United States shall file a supplemental brief addressing the interest and other statutor y additions it contends have accrued under Count I since August 27, 2010. In its status report filed June 8, 2012, the government stipulated that the defendant TCF National Banks mortgage on defendant Marcy Elmans property is superior to the governm ents tax lien on that property, see Docket #45, the position that TCF took in its affirmative defense, see Docket # 16 . The United States and TCF shall therefore file a joint status report identifying what additional proceedings are necessary regarding defendant TCF. (For futher details see attached Order) (tlp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
