Jackson et al v. DHL Express (USA) Inc.

Plaintiff: Nathaniel Jackson and Michael Lowe
Defendant: DHL Express (USA) Inc
Case Number: 1:2011cv01850
Filed: March 16, 2011
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Ruben Castillo
Nature of Suit: Voting
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson et al v. DHL Express (USA) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Jackson
Represented By: Lee D Winston
Represented By: Melissa Ann Matuzak
Represented By: Leonard C. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Lowe
Represented By: Leonard C. Goodman
Represented By: Melissa Ann Matuzak
Represented By: Lee D Winston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DHL Express (USA) Inc
Represented By: Richard Burk Lapp
Represented By: Camille Annette Olson
Represented By: Nicole K Peracke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.