Monturano v. Lefkofsky et al
| Theresa Monturano |
| Eric P. Lefkofsky, Peter J. Barris, Kevin J. Efrusy, Mellody Hobson, Bradley A. Keywell, Theodore J. Leonsis, Andrew D. Mason, Howard Schultz and Groupon, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv02507 |
| April 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Joan H. Lefkow |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Theresa Monturano by Lori Ann Fanning (Fanning, Lori) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Theresa Monturano by Marvin Alan Miller (Miller, Marvin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Miller, Marvin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Abuse of Control filed by Theresa Monturano; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-7019890.(Miller, Marvin) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Peter J. Barris, Kevin J. Efrusy, Mellody Hobson, Bradley A. Keywell, Eric P. Lefkofsky, Theodore J. Leonsis, Andrew D. Mason, Howard Schultz (aee, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Groupon, Inc. (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
