Weber-Stephen Products, LLC v. Sears Holdings Corporation
| Weber-Stephen Products, LLC |
| Sears Holdings Corporation |
| 1:2013cv01686 |
| March 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Edmond E. Chang |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
428
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 12/22/2015: For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Sears's motion for summary judgment 326 as to the '045 patent is denied; Sears's motion for summary judgment [ 332] at to the '834 patent is granted in part and denied in part; and Sears's motion for summary judgment 345 on the '874 patent is granted in part and denied in part. At the next status hearing, the parties shall be prepared to either ask for a settlement conference or set a trial schedule on the surviving claims (which are summarized in the Opinion's conclusion). Emailed notice(Chang, Edmond)
|
|
Filing
424
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Sears's motion 338 for summary judgment on likelihood of confusion (Count 4) is denied. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
419
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Sears's motion for summary judgment on the trade-dress claim 264 based on lack of secondary meaning is denied. Weber's motion to strike [304, 305] is denied.Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
285
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Weber's motion for summary judgment 193 on the antitrust and breach of contract claims is granted in part and denied in part. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
235
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. This Opinion decides the claim-construction disputes. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Weber's motion to dismiss certain counterclaims and strike affirmative defense 43 is granted in part and denied in part. Sears's Counterclaims 3 and 10 (inequitable conduct) survive, as does Sears's Affirmative Defense Number 8. Sears's Counterclaims 8, 9, 11, and 12 are dismissed. As explained in the Opinion, the Court orders joinder of Sears, Roebuck and Company to this lawsuit. Mailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the opinion, Defendant's motion to dismiss 20 the trade dress claim is denied.Mailed notice(slb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
