North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. v. Merck & Co., Inc.
North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. |
Merck & Co., Inc. |
1:2013cv03113 |
April 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Amy J Eve |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve: Pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. All pending dates and deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (kef, ) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Barbakoff, Gregg) |
Filing 34 ANSWER to amended complaint by Merck & Co., Inc.(Scharf, Stephanie) |
Filing 33 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve: Status hearing set for 10/29/2013 at 08:30 AM.Mailed notice (kef, ) |
Filing 32 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. by Gregg Michael Barbakoff (Barbakoff, Gregg) |
Filing 31 ORDER Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 9/13/2013: The Court denies Defendant's motion to dismiss #19 brought pursuant to Federal Rule ofCivil Procedure 12(b)(6). Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures shall be exchanged by 10/4/13. Written discovery shall be issued by 10/11/13. Status hearing remains set for 10/29/13 at 8:30 a.m. [For further details, see attached Order.] Mailed notice(kef, ) |
Filing 30 REPLY by Merck & Co., Inc. to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIMpursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) #19 , response in opposition to motion, #29 (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 29 RESPONSE by North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIMpursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) #19 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Vold, Aleksandra) |
Filing 28 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of time #26 is granted. Response to defendant's motion to dismiss #19 shall be filed on 8/13/13. Reply by 8/27/13. No appearance is required on the 8/12/13 notice date. Mailed notice (kef, ) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Motion by Aleksandra M. S. Vold for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply #26 before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 8/12/2013 at 08:30 AM. (Vold, Aleksandra) |
Filing 26 MOTION by Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. for extension of time to file response/reply (Vold, Aleksandra) |
Filing 25 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve:Status hearing held on 7/9/2013 and continued to 10/29/2013 at 08:30 AM. Defendant's motion to dismiss #19 is entered. Response by 8/6/13. Reply by 8/20/13. Mailed notice (kef, ) |
Filing 24 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve: Motion for leave to withdraw appearance on behalf of plaintiff #21 is granted. Peter Carlson is given leave to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff. Mailed notice (tlm) |
Filing 23 Correction to Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Merck & Co., Inc. (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Motion by Joseph J Siprut for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney #21 before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 7/9/2013 at 08:30 AM. (Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 21 MOTION by counsel for Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. to withdraw as attorney (Peter Carlson) (Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Motion by Stephanie Ann Scharf for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #19 before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 7/9/2013 at 08:30 AM. (Scharf, Stephanie) |
Filing 19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIMpursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibits 1 through 7 to Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Scharf, Stephanie) |
Filing 18 First AMENDED complaint by North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. against Merck & Co., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file first amended complaint #15 is granted. Counsel shall separately file the first amended complaint upon receipt of this order. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to the amended complaint by 7/1/13. Defendant's motion to dismiss #11 is denied as moot in light of the amended complaint. Status hearing set for 8/29/13 is stricken and reset to 7/9/13 at 8:30 a.m. No appearance is required on the 6/18/13 notice date. Mailed notice (kef, ) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Peter K. Carlson for presentment of motion for leave to file #15 before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 6/18/2013 at 08:30 AM. (Carlson, Peter) |
Filing 15 MOTION by Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. for leave to file First Amended Class Action Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 14 F.R.C.P. Rule 7.1 and L.R. 3.2 Disclosure by Merck & Co., Inc. (Scharf, Stephanie) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve:Motion hearing held on 5/23/2013. Defendant's motion to dismiss #11 is entered. Response by 6/13/13. Reply by 6/27/13. Status hearing set for 6/10/13 is stricken and reset to 8/29/13 at 8:30 a.m. Joint status report deadline is stricken. Mailed notice (kef, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Deirdre Anne Fox for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #11 before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 5/23/2013 at 08:30 AM. (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exhibits Part 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibits Part 2)(Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. by Deirdre Anne Fox (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. by Stephanie Ann Scharf (Scharf, Stephanie) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. as to Merck & Co., Inc. on 4/29/2013, answer due 5/20/2013. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Process Server)(Carlson, Peter) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. by Aleksandra M. S. Vold (Vold, Aleksandra) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve: Initial status hearing set for 6/10/13 at 8:30 a.m. in courtroom 1241. Parties shall refer to Judge St. Eve's web page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov and file a joint status report by 6/5/13 as set forth in the Initial Status Conferences procedure. Plaintiff's motion to certify class #4 is denied without prejudice with leave to refile once defendant has appeared. Defendant is on noticed that this is a putative class action. Mailed notice (kef, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (tlm) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. by Peter Kyle Carlson (Carlson, Peter) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. to certify class (Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd. by Joseph J Siprut (Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Siprut, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by North Suburban Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-8283200. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Siprut, Joseph) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel G. Martin. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.