Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. v. Veretek Corporation et al
| Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. |
| Antonio Belmonte, Timm Rucinski, Richard Pulciani, Veretek Corporation, Three Sixty Coatings, L.L.C. and David M Rairick |
| 1:2013cv04837 |
| July 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Acoustical's motion to dismiss 49 and dismisses Count II. Status hearing set for 8/13/2014 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/15/2014: Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
38
ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Court grants in part and denies in part the Vertetek Defendants' motion to dismiss 27 and grants in part and denies in part the 360 Defendants' motion to dismiss 29 . The Court denies the Vertet ek Defendants' motion for a more definite statement 27 . Counts 6 and 7 are dismissed as to Defendants Richard Pulciani, Timm Rucinski, and Antonio Belmonte, and Count 5 is dismissed as to Defendant David Rairick. All other claims survive Defendants' motions to dismiss. Status hearing set for 4/29/2014 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/8/2014. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
