Christofalos v. Cohen
Appellant: Danny Christofalos
Appellee: Joseph E Cohen
Case Number: 1:2014cv06958
Filed: September 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: William T. Hart
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Opinion and Order: Debtor-appellant's motion for reconsideration 18 is denied. Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 3/24/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 OPINION and Order. Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 1/29/2015. Mailed notice (sxw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christofalos v. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Danny Christofalos
Represented By: Maurice Salem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Joseph E Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?